The Church of England’s AI Guide Is the Sanity We Need
TL;DR: The Church of England's new practical AI guide provides a wise, theologically grounded framework for local churches to move past fear and engage with technology responsibly.
The Church of England released a practical guide for churches using AI this week, and it’s one of the most encouraging things I’ve seen in the Christian tech conversation all year. It’s not a list of approved apps or a fearful inventory of risks. It’s a call for discernment. And in a moment where churches seem stuck between ignoring AI completely and panicking about it, a call to sober-minded, theological thinking is exactly the leadership we need.
For months, I’ve watched pastors and ministry leaders fall into one of two camps. The first camp uncritically adopts AI for everything, chasing efficiency without counting the cost to community or truth. The second camp recoils in fear, labeling these tools as inherently deceptive or demonic, and shuts the door on any conversation. Neither response reflects biblical wisdom. One is poor stewardship, the other is driven by a fear that is not from God.
The Christian life isn’t about avoiding every new thing, nor is it about embracing every new thing. It’s about evaluating every new thing against the unchanging truth of God’s Word. That’s why the question we should be asking is not, “Is it a sin to use AI?” , but rather, “How can we use this for God’s glory and the good of our neighbors?”
A framework for thinking, not a list of rules
What makes the Church of England’s approach so refreshing is its focus on asking the right questions. Instead of handing down a list of prohibitions, the advisory framework equips local parish leaders to think through the implications of AI for their own communities. It encourages a posture of what they call “informed skepticism and cautious optimism.” I just call it wisdom.
The guide pushes churches to evaluate AI tools against core Christian commitments. It’s a practical outworking of our mandate to be discerning people who test all things and hold fast to what is good.
Here are some of the key questions the guide encourages church leaders to ask, which any congregation could adopt:
Question Area · Core Principle · Sample Question for a Church
Truth · Does this honor God who is Truth? · If we use AI to write a social media post, have we verified its claims and does it reflect our genuine church life?
Love · Does this serve our neighbor? · Does using an AI chatbot for pastoral inquiries make people feel cared for, or does it create a barrier to real relationship?
Community · Does this build up the body of Christ? · Will automating our small group announcements help people connect, or will it make our church feel more impersonal?
Exclusion · Who is being left behind? · If our church moves heavily into digital tools, how are we serving the elderly or those without reliable internet access?
This is the work. This is the hard, necessary process of cultivating digital wisdom in the church instead of just reacting to the latest trend. It reflects the biblical call to be deliberate and thoughtful in all we do.
For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds; Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;
2 Corinthians 10:4-5
Bringing our thoughts about AI “into captivity to the obedience of Christ” means we can’t just ignore it. We have to engage it, test it, and direct it toward godly ends. This is what the Church of England is modeling.
Answering the strongest objection
The strongest and most common objection I hear from Christians is that generative AI is built on deception. It produces things that aren't real. It can hallucinate facts, invent Scripture, and mimic human creativity in a way that feels dishonest. The concern is that relying on AI will inevitably hollow out the authenticity of our witness and our relationships.
This is a serious concern. I take it seriously as a Christian and as a software builder. These models can and do produce falsehoods. If a church uses AI to generate a devotional that misinterprets Scripture, that is a real problem. If a ministry uses an AI-generated image that presents a false gospel, that does real harm.
But the risk of misuse doesn’t nullify the possibility of proper use. A tool is not its worst-case scenario. We don’t ban cars because they can be driven recklessly. We teach people to drive, establish traffic laws, and build guardrails on the highway. We must apply the same logic here. The answer to AI’s potential for falsehood is not to run from it, but to build better guardrails.
Proportional and practical guardrails
Part of my work in building FaithGPT has been wrestling with this very problem. How do you design an AI tool that serves the church without undermining truth? One of the answers we’ve developed is a tool called DoctrineGuard . It’s designed to be a practical guardrail, helping a pastor or writer review a piece of text—like a sermon, a blog post, or a Bible study guide—for theological and biblical accuracy. It doesn’t replace the Holy Spirit or the pastor’s responsibility, but it acts as a helpful assistant, flagging potential issues and checking Scripture citations.
This is the kind of specific, proportionate response we need. Instead of a blanket ban, we create processes for verification. Instead of uncritical adoption, we insist on human oversight and final responsibility. The Church of England’s guide points us in this direction, and it opens the door for a host of practical applications in the local church when done with care.
A church administrator can use AI to help draft a first version of the weekly bulletin, but the pastor must still review and approve it. A communications director can use AI to generate image ideas for a sermon series, but a human must make the final creative choice. This keeps people in charge, using AI as a tool, not an authority.
A starting point for every church
This guidance isn’t just for Anglicans. It's a gift to the global Church. It gives every elder board, every pastor, and every ministry leader a template for starting a conversation they should already be having.
We cannot afford to let fear or ignorance dictate our approach to technology. The mission of the church is too important. Christian leaders must guide AI’s future , not be led by it.
The Church of England has provided a welcome dose of sanity. They have modeled a path of thoughtful, courageous engagement. Now it's up to the rest of us to walk it.
If you want to apply this same spirit of discernment to your own walk with God, you can start by exploring Scripture with tools designed to help you think more deeply. You can ask hard questions, get historical context, and compare Scripture with Scripture using the AI Bible Assistant at FaithGPT . It’s one small way to practice bringing every thought captive to Christ.
Helpful Scripture resources
Contact & support
Email the FaithGPT team at hello@faithgpt.io or visit the contact page .
Explore FaithGPT
